A melhor ferramenta para a sua pesquisa, trabalho e TCC!
- Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USP
- Universidade Nacional da Austrália
- Instituto Universitário Europeu
- Universität Tübingen
- Quens University
- Universidad del Norte
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- Universidade Autônoma de Barcelona
- Universidade Duke
- London School of Economics and Political Science Thesis
- Mais Publicadores...
‣ Procedimento e substância da democracia: qual o lugar da justiça social na teoria democrática?; Democracys procedure and substance: what is the place of social justice in the democratic theory?
‣ Concepções de direito e justiça: a teoria do direito de Ronald Dworkin e o liberalismo político de John Rawls; Conceptions of law and justice: Ronald Dworkins legal theory and John Rawlss political liberalism
‣ Liberalismo político: uma defesa; Political liberalism: arguing for
‣ Liberalism - what’s in a name?
‣ A Philosophy of Restraint: Justice and Pluralism in the New Theory of Political Liberalism
‣ Gerechtigkeit denken. John Rawls' politische Philosophie aus sozialethischer Perspektive.; Thinking on Justice. John Rawls Political Philosophy from a Social-ethical Perspective.
‣ Liberal Ethics & Political Obligation
‣ Political Liberalism and the Virtues of Citizens
‣ La justicia como problema político. Del constructivismo moral kantiano al constructivismo político rawlsiano.; Justice as political problem. From Kantian moral constructivism to Rawlsian political constructivism. [Spanish]
‣ Political liberalism, social pluralism and group conflict
‣ La razón jurídica como modelo de razón pública : Rawls, Dworkin y el Derecho
‣ Political Liberalism and the Characterization of the Moral Virtues
‣ Both Citizen and Saint: Religious Integrity and Liberal Democracy
In this dissertation, I develop a political liberal ethics of citizenship that reconciles conflicting religious and civic obligations concerning political participation and deliberation--a liberal-democratic ethics of citizenship that is compatible with religious integrity. I begin by canvassing the current state of the debate between political liberals and their religious critics, engaging Rawls's Political Liberalism and the various religious objections Nicholas Wolterstorff, Christopher Eberle, Robert George, John Finnis, Paul Weithman, Jeffrey Stout, and Gerald Gaus and Kevin Vallier develop (Chapter One). I then critically evaluate political liberalism's requirements of citizens in light of the religious objections and the religious objections in light of political liberal norms of reciprocity, concluding that some religious citizens have legitimate complaints against citizenship requirements that forbid citizens from offering religious arguments alone in public political discussions (Chapter Two). Next, I propose an alternative set of guidelines for public political discussions in constitutional democracies, the phased account of democratic decision-making, that, I argue, addresses the religious citizens' legitimate complaints without undermining a constitutional democracy's legitimacy or commitment to public justification (Chapter Three). Then...